Filburn was a small farmer in ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the agricultural adjustment act of 1938. Filburn doesnt ring a bell, thats certainly understandable even informed adults at the time were preoccupied by slightly more immediate threats to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness than wickard nevertheless, its poetically appropriate that wickard rhymes with wicked, with no personal offense intended toward the late secretary of. According to the supreme court decision in wickard v. Justice jackson delivered the opinion of the court. He graduated from purdue university in 1915 with a bachelors degree in agriculture, and he was chosen as master farmer of indiana in 1927 for his improvements in stock feeding and farming. Laws ought never be read against anything but their text. A farmer in ohio, roscoe filburn, produced a greater quantity of wheat than what congress had allowed under the agricultural adjustment act. As secretary of agriculture, claude wickard was involved in far more cases than roscoe filburn, a private citizen. Chad hildebrand 4416 history 555 case brief wickard v. The bar of proving a substantial effect on interstate commerce is a pretty low one, and wheat production here certainly meets that threshold, especially when taken in the aggregate. Filburn was a united states supreme court case that ultimately recognized the power of the united states federal government to regulate various forms of domestic economic activity. Filburn 1942 filburn 1942 this case involves the powers of congress to exert control over things that, while not enumerated in the constitution, are indirectly related to the governments ability to regulate those that are.
The united states had been in world war ii for two years in 1943, when claude wickard, head of the war foods administration as well as secretary of agriculture, had the hare brained idea of banning sliced bread. The agricultural adjustment act of 1938 set maximum acreages and bushel limits to wheat production. An overview of the united states supreme courts decision in wickard v. An activity does not need to have a direct effect on interstate commerce to fall within the commerce power, as long as the effect is substantial and economic.
Wickard, secretary of agriculture of the united states and others. Here are a list of questions i am unclear about when it comes to the commerce clause. Nov 10, 2011 this gets me to a point that has gotten too little attention in the coverage of the obamacare litigation. Despite its widereaching influence, hardly anyone outside of legal circles is aware of the 1942 case, wickard v.
The agricultural adjustment act of 1938, enacted to stabilize agricultural prices after the great depression, restricted how much wheat could be. He maintained a herd of dairy cattle, sold milk, raised poultry and sold poultry and eggs. The most important supreme court case you never heard of. Filburn refused to pay fine and filed complaint when wickard secretary of agriculture denied him a marketing card. The act was passed under congress commerce clause power. The purpose of this legislation was to stabilize the price of wheat and other commodities in the national market. Once upon a time the supreme court understood this distinction and properly abbreviated filburn. In 1938, the agricultural adjustment act was passed by the u. A farmer, roscoe filburn, was growing wheat for onfarm consumption. Educating the public about an important supreme court case wickard v. Perhaps the decision that best indicated how completely the supreme court had come in acquiescing to the nationalist economic philosophy of president franklin roosevelt and the democratic majorities in both houses of congress was wickard v.
Pending a referendum vote of farmers upon wheat quotas proclaimed by the secretary of agriculture under the agricultural adjustment act of 1938, the secretary made a radio address in which he advocated approval of the quotas and called. Wickard was born on his family farm in carroll county, indiana, near camden, on february 28, 1893. Fulburn only produces wheat for home consumption and to feed his cattle, which are traded on interstate commerce, to make seeds for next years crops, and sells a bit locally. The facts roscoe filburn, like many a farmer before him, grew wheat for consumption on his own farm. Filburn the court sustained a still deeper penetration by congress into the field of production. Filburn the supreme court ruled that filburn growing his own wheat affected the commerce clause. Filburn 1942 is likely to be a central topic in the justices opinions. Get free access to the complete judgment in wickard v. Filburn was a landmark supreme court of the united states case that was decided in 1942. Mass communications broadband laws, regulations and rules broadband transmission discrimination in insurance analysis insurance discrimination net. Mcclung that says that a local restaurant cant discriminate and not serve africanamericans. Filburn was a supreme court case that had to do with the extent of congresss power to regulate interstate commerce.
The commerce clause is a huge federal power, and thats why justice roberts terrifies me so much. Filburn in the early 1940s wheat production was at a. Filburn 1942 upheld the federal governments right to enforce quotas on the production of agricultural products in virtually all circumstances, even when, as in this case, a farmer exceeding his quotaby an admittedly sizable amount of. Lexis 1046 brought to you by free law project, a nonprofit dedicated to. The danger of reading laws against such things as the background of the great depression and the beginning of the second world war is that we subsequently end up with abominable rulings such as what justice jackson wrote in wickard v. Filburn argued that congress had overstepped its commerce power by regulating the amount of wheat he produced, because filburn was never going to sell his wheat and thus place it in the stream of interstate commerce. In the 1930s and later, roscoe filburn owned and operated a small farm in montgomery county, ohio. After providing a brief survey of american agriculture and its regulation between the world wars, this article describes the specific controversy over roscoe filburn s 1941 wheat crop. In so doing, he ran afoul of the agricultural adjustment act, which limited the amount of wheat that farmers could grow on their own land. The stimulation of commerce is a use of the regulatory function quite as definitely as prohibitions or restrictions thereon. Penalties were imposed if a farmer exceeded the quotas.
Without wickard, you dont have cases like katzenbach v. This case pertained to the constitutional question of whether the united states government had the authority to a regulate production of agricultural goods if those goods were intended for personal consumption and b whether the federal government had. He sold some of the wheat but used the other wheat for his own purposes feeding chickens, household use. Filburn, of course, should be abbreviated as filburn and not as wickard.
Filburn represents a pivotal moment in the supreme courts effort to define congresss. Filburn d owned an operated a farm where he grew some wheat. World heritage encyclopedia, the aggregation of the largest online encyclopedias available, and the most. Filburn the right interpretation of the commerce clause.
This case pertained to the constitutional question of whether the united states government had the authority to a regulate production of agricultural goods if those goods were intended for personal consumption and b whether the federal government had the authority to regulate. Read the fulltext case brief at wickardvfilburn during the gr. This might seem like a little windytwisty answer, but i promise that all the context is meaningful. Charles fahy solicitor general, department of justice, argued and. Pending a referendum vote of farmers upon wheat quotas proclaimed by the secretary of agriculture under the agricultural adjustment act of 1938, the secretary made a radio address in which he advocated approval of the quotas and called attention to the recent enactment by congress of the amendatory act, later approved may 26, 1941. Congress passed the agriculture adjustment act in 1938, which established a quota system for the amount of wheat that could be placed into interstate commerce between states and established penalties for violation. It involved a farmer who was fined by the united states department of agriculture and contested the federal governments authority to regulate his activities. Roscoe filburn, produced twice as much wheat than the. Filburn was fined for growing more wheat for private use than allowed under the agricultural adjustment act. In this case, the court granted congress extensive powers in this.
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic. The law, intended to stabilize wheat prices, was part of a system. Pending a referendum vote of farmers upon wheat quotas proclaimed by the secretary of agriculture under the agricultural adjustment act of 1938, the secretary made a radio address in which he advocated approval of. Filburn represented merely one component of the new deal courts commerce clause jurisprudence. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate commerce, since it never. The free market idea is generally associated with which economic system. Farmer, roscoe filburn was growing wheat that would be used for onfarm consumption. The argument has been made that while regulating free and fair trade. Join over 363,000 law students who have used quimbee to achieve academic success in law school through expertwritten outlines, a massive bank of case briefs, engaging video lessons, comprehensive essay practice exams with model answers, and practice questions. Theres nothing that escapes the reach of the federal government under the argument of wickard v. This gets me to a point that has gotten too little attention in the coverage of the obamacare litigation. Court holds that he is bound by congress wheat acreage and production allotment even though none of his wheat is sold in interstate commerce. The legal meaning of commerce in the commerce clause pdf.
Wickard removed the exemption of manufacturing, agriculture, etc. Filburn decision agree that there is virtually no local commercial action that if looked at in the aggregate wouldnt have a substantial impact on interstate commerce. Ap govt federalism supreme court cases flashcards quizlet. Supreme court decision that recognized the power of the federal government to regulate economic activity. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Filburns forgotten footnote of farm team federalism and its fate. It remains as one of the most important and farreaching cases concerning the new deal, and it set a precedent for an expansive reading of the u. Wheat farmer fine ruling goes against the grain wickard v. An ohio farmer, roscoe filburn, was growing wheat for use to feed animals on his own farm. Filburn was a case decided on november 9, 1942 by the united states supreme court. The interstate commerce clause, read literally, by original public meaning, by original intent, or even expansively, cannot give the federal government power over things that do not involve buying and selling products or services that.
333 503 465 227 702 312 301 630 1313 136 822 1254 1285 752 231 546 1024 162 1547 1499 112 1061 42 373 177 1201 848 1019 134